Cross-Border Data Forum Bannner

ARTICLE ARCHIVE

A recent IAPP opinion piece argues that the U.S. government’s June 2026 temporary restriction on access to Anthropic’s most advanced AI models should not be viewed as a deliberate “kill...

A recent IAPP analysis argues that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. Slaughter does not invalidate the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework’s redress mechanism. While the ruling limits Congress’s...

The United States government and its counterparts across the European Union today actively share information for law enforcement and security purposes, subject to robust fundamental rights protections. These cooperative relationships...

In a recent Lawfare article, Richard Salgado argues that by pursuing discredited and dangerous surveillance powers, Canada is putting in peril the legal investigative tool it needs most, a Canada-U.S....

This document answers frequently asked questions about the European Union’s E-Evidence legal framework, a new regime governing cross-border access to electronic evidence in criminal proceedings. It will become fully applicable...

This article, originally published in Lawfare, is the first legal analysis to appear in the United States of the European Union’s Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA), which was proposed...

  A shorter version of this article was published on May 20 by the IAPP.     Cybersecurity defenders are scrambling to respond to frontier artificial intelligence systems such as...

This article builds on a recent study by Theodore Christakis, “You Trust Your Chatbot with Everything: Should You? Part 1: How the Controller Uses Your Chat Data.” For access to...

This academic article by Gemma Davies and DeBrae Kennedy-Mayo, which is published in the New Journal of European Criminal Law, provides a doctrinal and policy-oriented analysis of the Second Additional...